China’s Arctic Paradox: Calling for Caution Amidst Shipping Expansion

by Dr. Michael Wenger
07/16/2025

While Chinese scientists issue urgent pleas to limit Arctic shipping to protect the region from the environmental impact, Chinese shipping companies plan on sending more and more vessels into the Arctic

As Arctic sea ice continues to decline, new shipping routes are opening up, offering potentially shorter transit times and new economic opportunities. With predictions of an Arctic summer free of sea ice as early as 2030, the Northern Sea Route is becoming more and more a reality for international trade.

Symbolizing China’s economic plans: CSCL Arctic Ocean was the largest container vessel measuring 400 m in length and carrying up to 19,100 containers. Nowadays, even slightly larger vessels are used for transportation.. Image: Kees Torn via Wikicommons CC BY-SA 2.0

Nations are moving to capitalize on this, but perhaps none display a more contradictory approach than China. On one hand, Chinese scientists are issuing dire warnings and calling for stringent regulations; on the other, Chinese shipping companies are aggressively expanding their Arctic operations, creating a stark paradox that could define the future of the fragile polar region.

Chinese Call for more Regulations in Arctic Shipping

In a letter published in the journal Science, a group of Chinese researchers made an urgent plea for action. They highlight that ships traversing these new lanes release black carbon, which accelerates ice melting. This creates a dangerous feedback loop: less ice allows for more ships, which in turn leads to even less ice. The scientists argue that current international regulations, such as the Polar Code and the International Maritime Organization’s carbon intensity index, are inadequate, lacking mandatory emission standards and failing to account for the unique vulnerability of the polar environment. Their proposed solution is a comprehensive, legally binding Arctic shipping convention to be established at the upcoming COP30 climate conference, which would set clear environmental standards, mandate green ship technology, and establish a transnational governance body to manage the routes.

Yet, while China’s scientific community calls for caution, its commercial enterprises are moving forward. The Chinese shipping company Yangpu Newnew Shipping Co., Ltd. has received permits to send multiple container ships through Russia’s Northern Sea Route this summer. Notably, vessels like the 4,363 TEU NewNew Panda 1 (Editor’s note: 1TEU = 1 20-foot container equivalent), have no ice classification, a testament to how accessible the route has become during the summer months. The company, which began its “Arctic Express Route” in 2023, is planning a significant expansion. This includes placing orders for five new Arc7 ice-class container ships capable of operating in the Arctic for most of the year with icebreaker assistance.

The potential future of Arctic shipping imagined by the author and visualized using an AI image generator. Image: Michael Wenger using Google AI

China’s Arctic Paradox

Herein lies the paradox. The push for Arctic shipping is driven by clear economic logic. A voyage from Russia’s Yamal Peninsula to China via the Arctic can be completed in under 20 days, roughly half the time it takes to travel through the traditional Suez Canal route. China is already a major destination for Russian LNG shipped via this route, receiving 35 deliveries from the Yamal LNG project in 2024 alone. This desire for a faster, cheaper trade route directly conflicts with the environmental warnings coming from its own experts. The expansion of shipping not only contributes to ice melt but also stimulates resource exploitation in the Arctic, which could release vast amounts of methane from thawing permafrost.

The contrasting approaches from Beijing’s scientific and commercial sectors highlight a significant challenge. The desire for a more efficient, economical shipping route is a powerful driver for commercial expansion in the Arctic. This stands in direct opposition to the science-based calls for increased regulation to protect a vulnerable ecosystem. How China balances these competing interests will be significant for the future governance and environmental health of the Arctic region.

Note on the use of images: One of the images featured in this article was generated using an artificial intelligence tool for visualization purposes. In line with Swiss Press Council guidelines, which call for transparency in the use of AI, we believe in clearly identifying such content to our readers. The editorial team maintains full responsibility for all published material within this article, including AI-assisted visuals, ensuring they align with the article’s context and do not mislead the audience.