Oil Pipeline Through the Permafrost

by Heiner Kubny
12/24/2025

The high-resolution satellite image from Google Earth clearly shows severe damage to the permafrost soil. (Image: Google Earth)

With the “Vankor–Payakha–Sever Bay Pipeline,” Russia is pushing ahead with one of the largest energy projects in the High North. The roughly 770-kilometer-long pipeline is part of Rosneft’s Vostok Oil project and is intended to transport crude oil from Arctic production areas to a new export terminal on the Kara Sea. From there, onward shipment via the Northern Sea Route is planned.

The Sever Port oil export terminal is being built as an extension of the port of Dikson on the Taimyr Peninsula. It will be used to transfer crude oil from the Payakha field onto tankers for transport via the Northeast Passage to countries in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. (Graphic: Vostok Oil project map)

Construction is taking place in an extremely sensitive region. The pipeline runs through permafrost areas that are becoming increasingly unstable as a result of climate change. Experts warn of ground subsidence and damage to the pipeline, which could promote leaks. An oil spill in this remote region would be difficult and slow to control.
The use of tracked off-road vehicles in the Taimyr tundra during the summer months is even explicitly prohibited under current Russian legislation.

The port of Sever will have a total berth length of 1,275 meters, and the first expansion phase is expected to reach an annual crude oil export capacity of 30 million tonnes. (Image: Vostok Oil)

Even the construction phase is already leaving clear traces in the tundra. Satellite images show wide clearings, construction roads, and compacted soils. In the Arctic, nature regenerates only very slowly, meaning that such interventions can have long-term consequences for water systems and ecosystems.

The project is also controversial in terms of climate policy. The pipeline creates new export capacities for fossil fuels—and thus infrastructure that is likely to be used for decades. Critics see this as a contradiction to global climate goals, while Rosneft points to economic development and comparatively efficient production.

The pipeline therefore stands as a symbol of a fundamental conflict between economic and geopolitical interests on the one hand, and environmental and climate protection on the other.

Heiner Kubny, PolarJournal