The role of science in the development of places in Antarctica

by Marcel Schütz
02/23/2026

Arrival at New Zealand’s Scott Base in Antarctica

Antarctica often appears on maps as an empty white space. Yet for the people who work there, it is anything but an abstract region. A scientific study shows how strongly the field season shapes the image of the continent and how ice, light and research together turn it into an experienced place.

The study is based on interviews with researchers at New Zealand’s Scott Base.
Its aim was to understand how scientific practice, personal experience and global connections interact to transform a seemingly empty space into a lived place.

Summer as Antarctica’s driving force

Since the earliest voyages into the Southern Ocean, extreme seasonality has shaped human activity in the south. Even early whalers and sealers could mainly reach the region in summer, when sea ice retreated and long days enabled work.

Today, the scientific field season is still concentrated in the few months between October and February. During this time, the number of people on the continent rises sharply, projects run in parallel, flights operate regularly and infrastructure works at full capacity.

Biologists study animal populations, geologists reconstruct landscape history, and atmospheric scientists analyse climate processes. When summer ends, most teams leave again, and only a small winter crew remains.

This short but intense period turns Antarctica into a place of concentration – scientifically, logistically and humanly.

Research at New Zealand’s Scott Base in Antarctica

Endless light, unstructured time

A central element of the field season is polar light and the midnight sun. In regions within the Antarctic Circle, the sun does not set for months during summer. For researchers, this means not only longer working hours but also a significant shift in their perception of time.

Many report that days merge into one another, sleep rhythms dissolve and daily life feels almost unreal. At the same time, the constant light increases productivity and pressure.

Months or even years of preparation often culminate in just a few weeks of fieldwork. Weather changes, technical issues or logistical delays can halt projects at any moment. This tension creates a paradoxical working experience often described by researchers as “hurry up and wait”: bursts of intense activity interrupted by enforced inactivity.

Fieldwork under the midnight sun

From dream destination to workplace

With each additional journey, many researchers’ perception changes. What initially feels like a spectacular expedition gradually becomes experienced as a workplace.

Antarctica is thus perceived not only as a natural environment but also as a functional research space, an international laboratory in which scientific routines, logistics and teamwork shape daily life.

This development follows a longer historical trajectory. Since at least the International Geophysical Year in the 1950s, Antarctica has developed into a permanent global space of science.

Researchers in front of Shackleton’s Hut in Antarctica

A continent of connections

The study also shows that Antarctic research never takes place in isolation. Every expedition forms part of a global network of institutions, funding structures, transport chains and international cooperation.

The journey to Antarctica usually begins long before arrival — with research contacts, applications, logistical planning and international collaboration. On site, these connections continue to shape everyday life between stations, nations and disciplines.

In this sense, Antarctica is created not only by its landscape, but by relationships.
It is a place continuously built through global scientific networks.

Stories that shape the continent

Another finding concerns how these experiences are communicated. Many researchers report how difficult it is to explain life in the Antarctic field back home.

Photographs, personal accounts and scientific narratives therefore become essential tools for sharing the experience. These stories in turn shape the public image of Antarctica, even among people who will never set foot on the continent.

A cycle emerges: research shapes experiences, experiences generate stories, and these stories shape the global perception of Antarctica.

A place constantly in the making

The study makes clear that Antarctica is not a static space. Its meaning evolves continuously through environmental conditions, scientific work and human perception.

Each field season therefore produces not only new data, but also contributes to how we understand this extreme continent.

Antarctica is not only explored.
With every season, it is made into a place anew.

This study is by Dr Erin Neufeld.